The film «Salem’s Lot», which adapts Stephen King’s vampire novel of the same name, is now streaming on Max —, but critics’ reviews suggest that it is probably not worth watching.
Currently, the movie has a «Salem’s Lot» 53% «freshness» on Rotten Tomatoes (so far, there are only critics’ ratings, but after today’s debut on Max, we expect an influx of audience reviews).
For comparison, RT’s critics gave the 1979 version an 89% «freshness» rating based on 17 reviews, while the 2004 version received a 68% rating based on 25 reviews.
Specialized websites call the adaptation rather mediocre and short, while the characters are criticized for «lack of depth».
At the same time, some reviewers note that the film is not bad for a one-time viewing in the company of friends who are not familiar with King’s books (while loyal fans are unlikely to like the adaptation).
«Salem’s Lot» is based on Stephen King’s legendary 1975 vampire novel and tells the story of writer Ben Meyers (Lewis Pullman), who returns to his hometown in search of inspiration for his new book, but discovers that the city has been taken over by a bloodthirsty vampire.
The film is directed by Gary Doberman («Anabelle 3») and features Alfrey Woodard (Dr. Cody), Mackenzie Lee (Susan Norton), Bill Camp (Matthew Burke), Spencer Trit Clarke (Mike Ryerson), Pilou Asbæk (Stryker) and John Benjamin Hickey (Father Callaghan).